[Thomas Wouters] > No, and that's one more reason to reverse my patch ! :-) Note > that I didn't *add* the Makefile, I only added Grammar to the > directories-to-run-make-in-by-default. > ... > The reason it was added was the multitude of Grammar-changing > patches on SF, and the number of people that forgot to run 'make' > in Grammar/ after applying them. I mentioned adding Grammar/ to > the directories to be made, Guido said it was a good idea, and > noone complained to it until after it was added ;P And what exactly is the complaint? It's nice to build things that are out of date; I haven't used Unix(tm) for some time, but I vaguely recall that was "make"'s purpose in life <wink>. Or is it that the grammar files are getting rebuilt unnecessarily? > ... > My-boss-doesn't-pay-me-to-work-on-Windows-ly y'rs, Your boss *pays* you?! Wow. No wonder you get so much done.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4