On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 11:27:41AM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: >+0, but it should probably be called PyDict_SetItemSomething(). It >seems more related to the other PyDict_SetItem*() functions, even >though in those cases the `*' refers to the type of the key, not the >value. PyDict_SetItemInteger seems misleading; PyDict_SetItemStringToInteger is simply long. PyDict_SetIntegerItem, maybe? :) Anyway, I'll start working on a patch and change the name later once there's a good suggestion. --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4