What about 'indexing' xor 'in' ? Like that: for i indexing sequence: # good for e in sequence: # good for i indexing e in sequence: # BAD! This might help Guido to understand what it does in the 'indexing' case. I admit that the third one may be a bit harder to parse, so why not *leave it out*? But then I'm sure this has also been discussed before. Nevertheless I'll mail Barry and volunteer for a PEP on this. [Tim Peters about his life] > I've been trying to sell "indexing" for most of my adult life then-I'll-have-to-spend-another-life-on-it-ly y'rs Peter -- Peter Schneider-Kamp ++47-7388-7331 Herman Krags veg 51-11 mailto:peter@schneider-kamp.de N-7050 Trondheim http://schneider-kamp.de
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4