>>>>> "TW" == Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> writes:
TW> Really ? Hmmmm...
TW> [Tim Peters]
>> Me too! +1 on changing ">>" to "to" here. Then we can
>> introduce
TW> I guessed I missed the sarcasm ;-P
No, Tim just forgot to twist the blue knob while he was pressing the
shiny pedal on Guido's time machine. I've made the same mistake
myself before -- the VRTM can be as inscrutable as the BDFL himself at
times. Sadly, changing those opinions now would cause an irreparable
time paradox, the outcome of which would force Python to be called
Bacon and require you to type `albatross' instead of colons to start
every block.
good-thing-tim-had-the-nose-plugs-in-or-Python-would-only-work-on-
19-bit-architectures-ly y'rs,
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4