On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 03:29:05AM -0400, Tim Peters wrote: > [Moshe Zadka] > > Ummmmm...... > > > > print to myfile (print a newline on myfile) > > print to, myfile (print to+" "+myfile to stdout) > > Like I (and Greg too) clearly said all along, -1 on changing ">>" to "to"! Really ? Hmmmm... [Greg Ewing] > Looks reasonably good. Not entirely sure I like the look > of >> though -- a bit too reminiscent of C++. > > How about > > print to myfile, x, y, z [Barry Warsaw] > Not bad at all. Seems quite Pythonic to me. [Tim Peters] > Me too! +1 on changing ">>" to "to" here. Then we can introduce [print from etc] I guessed I missed the sarcasm ;-P Gullib-ly y'rs, -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4