tim_one:
> +1 on changing ">>" to "to" here.
Your +1 might be a bit hasty. I've just realised that
a non-reserved word in that position would be ambiguous,
as can be seen by considering
print to(myfile), x, y, z
> Then we can introduce
>
> x = print from myfile, 3
Actually, for the sake of symmetry, I was going to suggest
input from myfile, x, y ,z
except that the word 'input' is already taken. Bummer.
But wait a moment, we could have
from myfile input x, y, z
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a |
Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. |
greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4