A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-August/008358.html below:

[Patches] [Patch #101175] Fix slight bug in the Ref manual docs on listcomprehensions

[Python-Dev] Re: [Patches] [Patch #101175] Fix slight bug in the Ref manual docs on listcomprehensions [Python-Dev] Re: [Patches] [Patch #101175] Fix slight bug in the Ref manual docs on listcomprehensionsKa-Ping Yee ping@lfw.org
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 23:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Greg Ewing wrote:
> > [x if 6] should not be a legal expression but the grammar allows it today.
> 
> Why shouldn't it be legal?
[...]
> Excluding it will make both the implementation and documentation
> more complicated, with no benefit that I can see.

I don't have a strong opinion on this either way, but i can state
pretty confidently that the change would be tiny and simple: just
replace "list_iter" in the listmaker production with "list_for",
and you are done.


-- ?!ng

"I'm not trying not to answer the question; i'm just not answering it."
    -- Lenore Snell





RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4