On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 12:13:00AM -0400, Tim Peters wrote: > > This is the second gratuitous change that's been made to my > > LC syntax without any apparent debate. > > The syntax hasn't been changed yet -- this *is* the debate. I won't say any > more about it, let's hear what others think. It'd be nice to hear *what* the exact syntax issue is. At first I thought you meant forcing parentheses around all forms of iterator expressions, but apparently you mean requiring at least a single 'for' statement in a listcomp ? -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4