On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 10:46:39AM -0700, noreply@sourceforge.net wrote: [ About my slight fix to ref5.tex, on list comprehensions syntax ] > Comment by tim_one: > Reassigned to Fred, because it's a simple doc change. Fred, accept this > <wink> and check it in. Note that the grammar has a bug, though, so this > will need to be changed again (and so will the implementation). That is, > [x if 6] should not be a legal expression but the grammar allows it today. A comment by someone (?!ng ?) who forgot to login, at the original list-comprehensions patch suggests that Skip forgot to include the documentation patch to listcomps he provided. Ping, Skip, can you sort this out and check in the rest of that documentation (which supposedly includes a tutorial section as well) ? -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4