>>>>> "BT" == Bill Tutt <billtut@microsoft.com> writes:
BT> This is an alternative approach that we should certainly
BT> consider. We could use ANTLR (www.antlr.org) as our parser
BT> generator, and have it generate Java for JPython, and C++ for
BT> CPython. This would be a good chunk of work, and it's
BT> something I really don't have time to pursue. I don't even
BT> have time to pursue the idea about moving keyword recognition
BT> into the lexer.
BT> I'm just not sure if you want to bother introducing C++ into
BT> the Python codebase solely to only have one parser for CPython
BT> and JPython.
We've talked about exactly those issues internally a while back, but
never came to a conclusion (IIRC) about the C++ issue for CPython.
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4