ESR, responding to [(x, y) for y in something for x in somewhere if y in x] for list comprehension syntax: > Damn. That's unfortunate. With all due respect to the BDFL, I've come > to believe that having special syntax for this (rather than constructor > functions a la zip()) is a bad mistake. I predict it's going to come > back to bite us hard in the future. FWIW, these are my thoughts exactly (for this particular issue, anyway). Wont-bother-voting-cos-nobody-is-counting ly, Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4