Just van Rossum wrote:
>
> ...
>
> for <index> indexing <element> in <seq>:
> ...
Let me throw out another idea. What if sequences just had .items()
methods?
j=range(0,10)
for index, element in j.items():
...
While we wait for the sequence "base class" we could provide helper
functions that makes the implementation of both eager and lazy versions
easier.
--
Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus
"I don't want you to describe to me -- not ever -- what you were doing
to that poor boy to make him sound like that; but if you ever do it
again, please cover his mouth with your hand," Grandmother said.
-- John Irving, "A Prayer for Owen Meany"
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4