On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 11:14:20AM -0500, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > P.S.: I am cc'ing the list so everyone and Thomas can > > rush in and provide their RFC knowledge. Oh, I forgot to point out: I have some RFC knowledge, but decided not to use it in the case of the HELO message ;) I do have a lot of hands-on experience with SMTP, and I know for a fact very little MUA that talk SMTP send a FQDN in the HELO message. I think that sending the FQDN when we can (like we do, now) is a good idea, but I don't see a reason to force the HELO message to be a FQDN. -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4