> for (x in a, y in b): > ... Hmmm. Until someone smarter than me shoots it down for some obvious reason <wink>, it certainly appeals to me. My immediate reaction _is_ lockstep iteration, and that is the first time I can say that. Part of the reason is that it looks like a tuple unpack, which I think of as a "lockstep/parallel/atomic" operation... Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4