On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Thomas Wouters wrote: > > PIL, > > +0. The main reason I don't compile PIL myself is because it's such a hassle > to do it each time, so I think adding it would be nice. However, I'm not > sure if it's doable to add, whether it would present a lot of problems for > 'strange' platforms and the like. > > > and Vladimir's shared-memory module. > > +1. Fits very nicely with the mmapmodule, even if it's supported on less > platforms. > > But perhaps all this falls in the 'batteries included' PEP ? Or perhaps a > new PEP, 'enriching the Standard Library' ? PIL is definitely in the 206 PEP. The others are not yet there. Please note that a central database of "useful modules" which are in distutils' .tar.gz (or maybe .zip, now that Python has zipfile.py") + a simple tool to download and install. The main reason for the "batteries included" PEP is reliance on external libraries, which do not mesh as well with the distutils. expect-a-change-of-direction-in-the-pep-ly y'rs, Z. -- Moshe Zadka <moshez@math.huji.ac.il> There is no IGLU cabal. http://advogato.org/person/moshez
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4