On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 04:17:33PM -0500, Guido van Rossum wrote: > After a brief consult with Tim, I've decided to drop math.rint() -- > it's not standard C, can't be implemented in portable C, and its > naive (non-IEEE-754-aware) effect can easily be had in other ways. I don't particularly disagree, since I hardly do anything with floating point numbers, but how can something both not be implementable in portable C *and* it's effect easily be had in other ways ? I also recall someone who was implementing rint() on platforms that didnt have it... Or did that idea get trashed because it wasn't portable enough ? -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4