I'm a tad confused about the 'UNPACK_LIST' and 'UNPACK_TUPLE' opcodes. There doesn't seem to be a difference between the two, yet the way they are compiled is slightly different (but not much.) I can list all the differences I can see, but I just don't understand them, and because of that I'm not sure how to handle them in augmented assignment. UNPACK_LIST just seems so redundant :) Wouldn't it make sense to remove the difference between the two, or better yet, remove UNPACK_LIST (and possibly rename UNPACK_TUPLE to UNPACK_SEQ ?) We already lost bytecode compability anyway! -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4