On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote: > Hmm. I think the issue with known existing snprintf() > implementations with Open Source licenses was that they were at least > somewhat contanimating. I'll switch back to sprintf() until we have a > portable snprintf() implementation. Fred -- in your case, there is no need for sprintf -- a few sizeof(long)s along the way would make sure that your buffers are large enough. (For extreme future-proofing, you might also sizeof() the messages you print) (Tidbit: since sizeof(long) measures in bytes, and %d prints in decimals, then a buffer of length sizeof(long) is enough to hold a decimal represntation of a long). -- Moshe Zadka <moshez@math.huji.ac.il> There is no IGLU cabal. http://advogato.org/person/moshez
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4