> But assuming there are good reasons, I am happy. It wont bother me for > some time yet ;-) <just deleted a rant about the fact that anyone on > Windows who values their time in more than cents-per-hour would use MSVC, > but deleted it ;-> OK. Better cut my rates. Some people will be pleased ;) Borland C++ isn't that bad. With an optimiser and a decent debugger it'd even be usable as my main compiler. What is good about Borland is that it produces lots of meaningful warnings. I've never regretted ensuring that Scintilla/SciTE build on Windows with each of MSVC, Borland and GCC. It wasn't much work and real problems have been found by the extra checks done by Borland. You-should-try-it-sometime-ly y'rs, Neil
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4