> While METH_VARARGS is obviously a lot better than a hardcoded 1, shouldn't > METH_VARARGS be something like Py_METH_VARARGS or PY_METH_VARARGS to avoid > potential conflicts with other packages? Unless someone knows of a *real* conflict, I'd leave this one alone. Yes, it should be Py_*, but no, it's not worth the effort of changing all that. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.pythonlabs.com/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4