Skip Montanaro wrote:
>
> Isn't that what the code object's co_lnotab is for? I thought the idea was
> to dispense with SET_LINENO altogether and just compute line numbers using
> co_lnotab on those rare occasions (debugging, tracebacks, etc) when you
> needed them.
Don't worry about it anymore. It's all in Postponed patch #101022 at SF.
It makes the current "-O" the default (and uses co_lnotab), and reverts
back to the current default with "-d".
I give myself a break on this. You guys need to test it now and report
some feedback and impressions. If only to help Guido making up his mind
and give him a chance to pronounce on it <wink>.
[?!ng]
> Anyway, i suppose this is all rather moot now that Vladimir has a
> clever scheme for tracing even without SET_LINENO. Go Vladimir!
> Your last proposal sounded great.
Which one? They are all the latest <wink>.
See also the log msg of the latest tiny patch update at SF.
--
Vladimir MARANGOZOV | Vladimir.Marangozov@inrialpes.fr
http://sirac.inrialpes.fr/~marangoz | tel:(+33-4)76615277 fax:76615252
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4