greg wrote:
> I think there are some big conceptual problems with allowing
> negative steps in a slice.
wasn't "slices" supposed to work the same way as "ranges"?
from PEP-204:
"Extended slices do show, however, that there is already a
perfectly valid and applicable syntax to denote ranges in a way
that solve all of the earlier stated disadvantages of the use of
the range() function"
> In the face of such confusion, the only Pythonic thing would
> seem to be to disallow these things.
...and kill PEP-204 at the same time.
</F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4