Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-April/003753.html below:

[Python-Dev] L1 data cache profile for Python 1.5.2 and 1.6

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] c.l.py readership datapoint (was: Python 1.6a2 Unicode bug)
• Next message: [Fwd: [Python-Dev] Where the speed is lost! (was: 1.6 speed)]
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Using this tool:

    http://www.cacheprof.org/

I got this output:

    http://www.enme.ucalgary.ca/~nascheme/python/cache.out
    http://www.enme.ucalgary.ca/~nascheme/python/cache-152.out

The cache miss rate for eval_code2 is about two times larger in
1.6.  The overall miss rate is about the same.  Is this
significant?

I suspect that the instruction cache is more important for
eval_code2.  Unfortunately cacheprof can only profile the L1 data
cache.  Perhaps someone will find this data useful or
interesting.


    Neil

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] c.l.py readership datapoint (was: Python 1.6a2 Unicode bug)
• Next message: [Fwd: [Python-Dev] Where the speed is lost! (was: 1.6 speed)]
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4