A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-April/003713.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: marking shared-ness

[Python-Dev] Re: marking shared-ness [Python-Dev] Re: marking shared-nessChristian Tismer tismer@tismer.com
Sat, 22 Apr 2000 13:53:57 +0200
Greg,

Greg Stein wrote:
<snip/
> Presuming you can keep your lock contention low, then your overall
> performances *goes up* once you have a multiprocessor machine. Sure, each
> processor runs Python (say) 10% slower, but you have *two* of them going.
> That is 180% compared to a central-lock Python on an MP machine.

Why didn't I think of this.
MP is a very very good point.
Makes now all much sense to me.

sorry for being dumb - happy easter - chris

-- 
Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tismer@appliedbiometrics.com>
Applied Biometrics GmbH      :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Kaunstr. 26                  :    *Starship* http://starship.python.net
14163 Berlin                 :     PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net
PGP Fingerprint       E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15  D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF
     where do you want to jump today?   http://www.stackless.com



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4