Jeremy Hylton wrote:
>
> >>>>> "CT" == Christian Tismer <tismer@tismer.com> writes:
>
> CT> I think it is fine that it crashed. There are obviously
> CT> extension modules left where the interpreter lock rule is
> CT> violated. The builtin Python code has been checked, there are
> CT> most probably no holes, including tkinter. Or, I made a mistake
> CT> in this little code:
>
> I think have misunderstood at least one of Mark's bug report and your
> response. Does the problem Mark reported rely on extension code? I
> thought the bug was triggered by running pure Python code. If that is
> the case, then it can never be fine that it crashed. If the problem
> relies on extension code, then there ought to be a way to write the
> extension so that it doesn't cause a crash.
Oh!
If it is so, then there is in fact a problem left
in the Kernel.
Mark, did you use an extension?
ciao - chris
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer@appliedbiometrics.com>
Applied Biometrics GmbH : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Kaunstr. 26 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net
14163 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net
PGP Fingerprint E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15 D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF
where do you want to jump today? http://www.stackless.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4