RetroSearch Browse

Thu Jun 10 10:49:31 CEST 1999 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/1999-June/095359.html

> Here's what I think we should do first (I've mentioned this before but
> nobody cheered me on :-).

Go, Guido, GO!!!!

What I'd like in the split you propose is to see which of the items would be 
implementable in Python, and try to do the split in such a way that such a 
Python implementation isn't ruled out.

Am I correct in guessing that after factoring out the components you mention 
the only things that aren't in a "replaceable component" are the builtin 
objects, and a little runtime glue (malloc and such)?
--
Jack Jansen             | ++++ stop the execution of Mumia Abu-Jamal ++++
Jack.Jansen at oratrix.com | ++++ if you agree copy these lines to your sig ++++
www.oratrix.nl/~jack    | see http://www.xs4all.nl/~tank/spg-l/sigaction.htm 

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/1999-June/095359.html below:

[Python-Dev] Splitting up the PVM