Jeremy Hylton wrote: [...] > I'm one of the silent 5 or 6. My reasons fall under "None of the > above." They are three in number: > 1. No time (the perennial excuse; next 2 weeks are quite hectic) > 2. I tried to use ndiff to compare old and new ceval.c, but > ran into some problems with that tool. (Tim, it looks > like the line endings are identical -- all '\012'.) Yes, there are a lot of changes. As a hint: windiff from VC++ does a great job here. You can see both sources in one, in a very readable colored form. > 3. Wasn't sure what to look at first > > My only suggestion would be to have an executive summary. If there > was a short README file -- no more than 150 lines -- that described > the essentials of the approach and told me what to look at first, I > would be able to comment more quickly. Thanks a lot. Will do this tomorrow moaning as my first task. feeling much better - ciao - chris -- Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at appliedbiometrics.com> Applied Biometrics GmbH : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 101 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net 10553 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net PGP Fingerprint E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15 D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF we're tired of banana software - shipped green, ripens at home
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4