Christian Tismer wrote: > > "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: > ... > > Also, has anybody considered writing list.pop(..,default) this way: > > > > if list: > > obj = list.pop() > > else: > > obj = default > > > > No exceptions, no changes, fast as hell :-) > > Yes, that's the best way to go, I think. > But wasn't the primary question directed on > an atomic function which is thread-safe? Right. And the above code doesn't solve this problem. Tim's code *does* solve the problem. It's the code we were using. It is a bit verbose though. > I'm not sure, this thread has grown too fast :-) Don't they all? Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:jim@digicool.com Python Powered! Technical Director (888) 344-4332 http://www.python.org Digital Creations http://www.digicool.com http://www.zope.org Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my permission. Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for repeats.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4