On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > > This makes perfect sense, and explains exactly what's going on. Let's > call it "poor design"[1] instead of "user error". A quick scan last > night of the Jitterbug site shows no signs of fixes or workarounds. > What would Jitterbug have to do to avoid these kinds of problems? > Maybe keep a checksum of the current submission and check it against > the next one to make sure it's not a re-submit. That's be good -- alternatively, insert a 'safe' CGI script after the validation -- "Thanks for submitting the bug. Click here to go back to the home page".
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4