On Fri, Mar 14, 2014, at 08:52 AM, Zachary Ware wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> > wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014, at 07:20 AM, vinay.sajip wrote: > >> diff --git a/.hgignore b/.hgignore > >> --- a/.hgignore > >> +++ b/.hgignore > >> @@ -24,6 +24,11 @@ > >> reflog.txt$ > >> tags$ > >> Lib/plat-mac/errors.rsrc.df.rsrc > >> +Doc/tools/sphinx/ > >> +Doc/tools/docutils/ > >> +Doc/tools/jinja/ > >> +Doc/tools/jinja2/ > >> +Doc/tools/pygments/ > > > > Why are you readding these when they were apparently purposely removed > > in eef7899ea7ab? > > It is rather ugly to build the docs in a 3.3 checkout, then update to > default and run 'hg status' without those entries in .hgignore. I can > understand not wanting to be bombarded by all of the untracked files, > but it's also pretty easy to enable the purge extension and do "hg > purge Doc/tools". This is why everyone should use the share extension and have separate working copies for every branch. :)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4