>> Didn't think so. NO_STRICT_LIST_APPEND was never documented, neither >> officially nor mentioned in NEWS when it was added (~14 months ago). > Hmm, didn't Guido mention it at least once on c.l.py ? *I* thought it > was the official way to make the transition, anyway :) A small note > that it now no longer exists could save some people a few hours of > frustration, after all. Why argue about it? I obviously don't think it's needed. If you think it is, last I looked you had check-in privileges too <0.9 wink>.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4