RetroSearch Browse

Mon Apr 22 09:25:13 PDT 2013 · http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-April/002353.html

For large changes like this, I recommend running the lic_check.sh script 
in the forest to verify the copyright headers are as expected.

-Joe

On 04/22/2013 01:55 AM, Miroslav Kos wrote:
> Hi,
> yes, this was a problem on our side - fixing it just now, those were 
> newly added packages and I forget to add them to packages to be 
> rebranded.
>
> Miran
>
>
>
> On 04/20/2013 09:18 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 20/04/2013 00:04, David Katleman wrote:
>>> Below are corrections to GPL headers found in JDK8 b86:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~katleman/8012643/webrev.jaxws.01
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~katleman/8012643/webrev.jdk.01
>>>
>>> Corresponding CR
>>>
>>> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8012643
>>>
>>> The jdk headers are punctuation changes.
>>>
>>> jaxws integrated 51 files with a wrong GPL header, so that part is a 
>>> bit more involved.
>>> Still no code changes, just headers, so anyone is qualified to 
>>> review them.
>> Looks fine to me too.
>>
>> I sponsored the JAX-WS update that went into b86. It was a monster 
>> patch (>70000 lines of changes) and really hard to see the wood from 
>> the trees when bringing in this volume of changes. In this case, the 
>> 51 files had to have their package changed from upstream so I'll bet 
>> this is why their headers were missed.
>>
>> Going forward, are fixing up issues in master a problem? Which 
>> scripts should be run to catch issues like this? I see in the top 
>> level repo that we have lic_check.sh - is that the script you use? Do 
>> you want these issues caught by integrators before they are pushed to 
>> master?
>>
>> -Alan.
>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-April/002353.html below:

JDK-8012643 JDK8 b86 source with GPL header errors (jaxws & jdk)