The i18n WG is satisfied and has closed this issue. Thanks, RI On 20/04/2014 16:50, Koji Ishii wrote: > Makes sense to me, fixed. > > On Jan 25, 2014, at 3:17 AM, Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com> wrote: > >> State: >> OPEN WG Comment >> Product: >> CSS3-text >> Raised by: >> Addison Phillips >> Opened on: >> 2013-12-06 >> Description: >> 5. Section 2.1: (Editorial) There is inconsistency in the capitalization of "Unicode consortium web site". Since each of these refers to a UAX, why not just refer to the Standard Annexes directly and not to the "consortium" or the "web site"? > > >
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2014 16:48:40 UTC
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4