On 27/05/14 8:46 PM, fantasai wrote: > There is no question in my mind that joining should not be prevented > across inline boundaries, regardless of color, font, line-height, > font-size, or whatever changes. So unless someone *actively objects* > because they think I'm *totally wrong*, I'm closing the discussion of > whether font/color/whatever changes in the text stream cause a break > in joining behavior as âNo, they do notâ, and I will clarify the spec > as appropriate, since people don't seem to take this for granted. It might be a good idea to also clarify in the text that not causing a break in joining behaviour does not necessarily imply any specific display result, which will depend on layout engine and font interaction. As a minimum, I think it might be reasonable to expect e.g. a letter in a medial joining situation will display as a medial form, but beyond that expectation cross-font and/or cross-glyph run layout of a kind that does not currently exist would be necessary to display a particular medial variant based on context or to cursively connect the glyphs of different fonts or sizes. JH
Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2014 17:13:29 UTC
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4