On 08/18/2014 03:28 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > 2. (Assuming a row flexbox.) We previously allowed max-width to > contribute to min-width:auto, and later allowed max-height + an > intrinsic aspect ratio to contribute, but we didn't generalize that to > the 'width' case as well, so that a definite 'height' + aspect ratio > would contribute. That's fixed now. I think this part makes sense. It looks like this was basically expanding on "any definite size constraints in the opposite dimension" from the old spec-text, which is good. I suspect this resolves a request-for-clarification that I'd posed about this spec-text a little while back.[1] (In that post, I was focusing on the cross-axis *min* size as the relevant "constraint", but it appears I should instead have been focusing on the cross-axis *max* size, which in retrospect makes sense.) Thanks, ~Daniel [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0053.html
Received on Monday, 18 August 2014 23:36:56 UTC
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4