Updated as proposed by Jonathan, thank you both.
From: CE Whitehead <cewcathar@hotmail.com<mailto:cewcathar@hotmail.com>>
Date: Friday, November 8, 2013 11:43 AM
To: "jfkthame@googlemail.com<mailto:jfkthame@googlemail.com>" <jfkthame@googlemail.com<mailto:jfkthame@googlemail.com>>, "www-style@w3.org<mailto:www-style@w3.org>" <www-style@w3.org<mailto:www-style@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: [CSSWG][css-text-3] CSS3 Text Last Call Working Draft
Resent-From: <www-style@w3.org<mailto:www-style@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Friday, November 8, 2013 11:43 AM
Thanks for the reply.
From: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@googlemail.com<mailto:jfkthame@googlemail.com?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BCSSWG%5D%5Bcss-text-3%5D%20CSS3%20Text%20Last%20Call%20Working%20Draft&In-Reply-To=%3C527BBF5C.7090900%40gmail.com%3E&References=%3C527BBF5C.7090900%40gmail.com%3E>>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 16:27:08 +0000
Message-ID: <527BBF5C.7090900@gmail.com<mailto:527BBF5C.7090900@gmail.com>>
To: www-style@w3.org<mailto:www-style@w3.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BCSSWG%5D%5Bcss-text-3%5D%20CSS3%20Text%20Last%20Call%20Working%20Draft&In-Reply-To=%3C527BBF5C.7090900%40gmail.com%3E&References=%3C527BBF5C.7090900%40gmail.com%3E>
On 7/11/13 15:20, CE Whitehead wrote:
>> Hi.
>> I have not read all of your document (http://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-3/
>> ), but have a few proofreading comments (most concerned with sentences
>> that in English normally take the present indicative, sentences that
>> describe a fact or habitual action, what we call the "scientific or
>> habitual present" I think).
>>
>> 2.1 Example 3 Discussion final paragraph
>>
>> "Text transformation happens after white space processing, which means
>> that full-width transforms only preserved U+0020 spaces to U+3000. "
>> { COMMENT: use the habitual/scientific present with "preserved" here,
>> not the past tense;
> I think you're mis-parsing this sentence. To clarify, "transforms" is
> the main verb in this clause, not part of a "full-width transforms"
> noun phrase; and "preserved" is used as a participial adjective
> describing those U+0020 spaces that were not removed during white space
> processing.
Yes, you are right; I did mis-parse this sentence! Sorry.
> But IMO it might be easier to understand if this were spelled out a
> little more fully, perhaps like:
> "Text transformation happens after white space processing, which means
> that full-width only transforms U+0020 spaces to U+3000 within
> preserved white space."
Yes this is nice!
> JK
Thanks, Jonathan.
Best,
--C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar@hotmail.com<mailto:cewcathar@hotmail.com>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4