On 03/07/2012 04:40 PM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote: > > I'll point out one more oddness with the current syntax. Like any issue > related to syntax, this is in some sense only about aesthetics. > > Currently, the syntax component after<'border-image-slice'> is an optional > > [/<âborder-image-widthâ>? [ /<âborder-image-outsetâ> ]?] > > . This has two implications: > > 1. A trailing slash is valid. > > 2. Two trailing slashes are not valid. ... > I have four proposals to address these: > > A. Leave the current syntax as it is. > B. Allow more tailing slashes. > C. Disallow trailing slash at the end. > D. Disallow empty component. We went with option C, which was the original intent. The corrected grammar follows: <âborder-image-sliceâ> [ / <âborder-image-widthâ> | / <âborder-image-widthâ>? / <âborder-image-outsetâ> ]? Please let us know if this satisfies your comment. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2012 21:26:40 UTC
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4