According to the N-Triples grammar [1], the following is a valid instance of the line production in an N-Triples document: <p:> <> <q:> <> <r:> <> "s" . But which part of the line matches the subject production, and which part matches the predicate production? As far as I can tell, the N-Triples specification does provide a means of interpretation. This is a very major bug, if so; it means that N-Triples does not have a usable grammar. Cf. http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2007-11-01.html#T09-28-40 Thanks, [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-testcases-20040210/#ntrip_grammar - RDF Test Cases, 3.1. Extended Backus-Naur Form (EBNF) Grammar -- Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2007 10:35:17 UTC
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3