Dear all,
Please find bellow a proposal for issue-262. I assumed that there is a "G" response that we discussed in a previous call even though I did not find anything about that in the current documents.
Normative text:
For Servers in direct communication with the User Agent that then communicate further with other parties within the same interaction but outside direct communication with the User Agent:
· If they share tracking data about the interaction those servers SHOULD send a "G" response
· If they do not share tracking data about the interaction those servers SHOULD send a "N" response.
Sorry for the short notice before the call.
Best regards,
Vincent
De : Nicholas Doty [mailto:npdoty@w3.org]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 novembre 2014 07:13
À : TOUBIANA Vincent
Cc : Tracking Protection Working Group
Objet : wiki page re: issue-262 (was Re: Agenda for November 19 TPWG call)
I believe we're still waiting for specific text proposals on any changes to TPE in order to facilitate tracking status resources/responses from gateways and ad exchanges. I've created this wiki page for people to collect proposals:
https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Regarding_gateways_and_exchanges
I've added a link to Shane's text about consent (though I suspect that would actually be a Compliance change). Feel free to add more proposals there, although also send to the mailing list so that everyone can see.
Hope this helps,
Nick
On November 18, 2014, at 8:11 PM, TOUBIANA Vincent <vtoubiana@cnil.fr> wrote:
> I have to send regrets for today's call beacause I'll be travelling. Regarding issue-262, do we have a wiki page where we can compare the different proposals and add a new one?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Vincent
>
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div>I believe we're still waiting for specific text proposals on any changes to TPE in order to facilitate tracking status resources/responses from gateways and ad exchanges. I've created this wiki page for people to collect proposals:</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span><a href="https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Regarding_gateways_and_exchanges">https://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Regarding_gateways_and_exchanges</a></div><div><br></div><div>I've added a link to Shane's text about consent (though I suspect that would actually be a Compliance change). Feel free to add more proposals there, although also send to the mailing list so that everyone can see.</div><div><br></div><div>Hope this helps,</div><div>Nick</div><br><div><div>On November 18, 2014, at 8:11 PM, TOUBIANA Vincent <<a href="mailto:vtoubiana@cnil.fr">vtoubiana@cnil.fr</a>> <mailto:vtoubiana@cnil.fr%3c/a%3e>> ; wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7638.1">
<title>RE: Agenda for November 19 TPWG call</title>
<div>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format --><p><font size="2">I have to send regrets for today's call beacause I'll be travelling. Regarding issue-262, do we have a wiki page where we can compare the different proposals and add a new one?<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Vincent<br></font></p></div></blockquote></div><br></body></html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.3