RetroSearch Browse

Thu Jan 22 12:05:01 PST 2015 · http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-January/081010.html

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:00 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:35 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Here is the link:
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ia32-abi/nq6cvH_VVV4
>>
>> The document contains this claim (as do many other psABI documents):
>>
>> "Bit-fields that are neither signed nor unsigned
>> always have non-negative values. Although they may have type char,
>> short, int, or long (which can have negative values), these bit-fields
>> have the same range as a bit-field of the same size with the
>> corresponding unsigned type."
>>
>
> Can you show me where this paragraph in IA-32 psABI?
> I couldn't find it in my copy.
>

FYI :-):

commit 2496a6db377b489668e49c39b6f477a4f8f0ec22
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail.com>
Date:   Wed Jan 7 13:05:49 2015 -0800

    Remove Bit-Fields


-- 
H.J.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-January/081010.html below:

[LLVMdev] FYI: IA-32 psABI draft version 0.1