RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jan 13 13:37:35 PST 2015 · http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-January/080512.html

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote:

> >> I didn't think there was *any* consensus that this was the desired path
> forward. ...
> > Correct.
>
> One step back then, do we have a consensus that the LLVM and LLD
> coding standards should converge?
>

Unless you want to have LLVM and LLD merged for some reason independently
of this patch, for now you can just assume LLVM and LLD will be separate.

-- Sean Silva

>
> -Greg
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150113/eb0088ab/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-January/080512.html below:

[LLVMdev] LLD Standalone CMake build