Know what they call the commercial version of Portable Apps? A Netbook. > Richard Riley wrote: > > Bastien <address@hidden> writes: > > > >> Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes: > >> > >>> Indeed. BTW, I was curious to see what PortableApps did/looked like, and > >>> (since I couldn't find an installation package for Linux) I downloaded > >>> the sources and looked at them: this thing seems to be Windoze only > >>> (maybe Mac too?) - is that true or did I overlook something? > >> To me that's true - I was a bit surprised too. > >> > >> Mmhh... maybe the Windows user-base is bigger than the Emacs user-base? > >> > >>> PS. And if so, shouldn't the FTC come after them for false advertising? > >>> PortableApps indeed :-) > >> :) > > > > Come on chaps, you can run Windows under Vmware or VirtualBox you know! > > > > > Portable Apps runs fine under wine. I have a copy on my usb stick in > case I go somewhere that only has Windows available. Since I don't have > a Windows computer at home I test it under wine. > > Of course I also have the Windows port of Emacs, so I can still run org, > even if I am forced to use Windows:) > > Ian. > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > address@hidden > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > > ---------------------------------------- David A. Gershman address@hidden http://dagertech.net/gershman/ "It's all about the path!" --d. gershman
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4