> Maurizio Vitale > <address@hidden> writes: > Is anybody working on making orgstruct work with programming modes (or > other modes that require the org "markup" to be hidden in comments)? Samuel Wales <address@hidden> writes: >> It might be nice to have these solutions in one place. Yes, an overview/tutorial of the various options would be good to have. >> >> I know of hideshow, hideshow-org, the email thread, >> outline-minor-mode plus regexp fixes, orgstruct, orgstruct++, >> orgtbl, and org-babel so far. [One obvious point for the record -- embedding code in org files is not a mutually exclusive alternative to the others: after C-c ' the code is edited in a language major mode buffer in which the other solutions might be used for folding / structuring] I'll add Carsten's outline-magic.el to that list. http://staff.science.uva.nl/~dominik/Tools/outline-magic.el Personally I've been using plain outline-minor-mode for code folding. I haven't used outline-magic, but it seems like perhaps I should. Is anyone out there currently using it? Dan >> >> I guess there are several categories. This is very rough. >> >> 1) code folding (e.g. hiding the contents of a defun) >> 2) as much of org as possible without changing the >> behavior of the mode itself too much. plain lists and >> headlines can go inside comments or docstrings. >> 3) literate programming. compile in two steps: >> compile from org and compile to binary. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Emacs-orgmode mailing list >> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. >> address@hidden >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4