Hi Ulf, I've finally pushed a change that allows whitespaces in labels and allow the "-r" switch to be used even if "-n" is not there. Please test it and let me know if it works as expected. Thanks, Ulf Stegemann <address@hidden> writes: >>> conclusion. I don't think that this is a problem. From the author's >>> point of view I think he/she knows what's going on since this is not the >>> default behaviour and the `-r' switch actually has to be added. And >>> after all we are talking about links. And as with any other link if the >>> link target is self-explanatory: fine, then I can use it as link name. If >>> it is not, I should choose something less confusing for the reader. >> >> One problem is the limitation about labels you can use. E.g. labels do >> not allow whitespaces. It is hard to write meaningful self-explanatory >> link names without using whitespaces. > > Ah okay, that is a good point indeed. I wasn't aware of the fact that > labels could not contain whitespaces. > >> I will see if I can overcome this in a clean way. > > That would be great. Thanks for your efforts! > > Ulf -- Bastien
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4