On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:29:30 +0200 meingbg <address@hidden> wrote: > | a | b | c | > |---+----+---| > | a | 2 | 2 | > | b | 3 | 7 | > | c | -3 | 4 | > | d | 5 | 9 | > #+TBLFM: address@hidden::@2$3=$2 A good solution is to use $3=vsum(@-I$-1..$-1) as proposed in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/1940/focus=1941 Nevertheless: If @2$3 is manually set to 2 in the table, then the formulas produce the expected outcome. So, the problem seems to be the order of execution. If column c is cleared and the formulas are executed, @2$3 is read to be 0 for the summation and is set to 2 only afterwards. Swapping the order in the TBLFM line doesn't help. Is the order something like field formulas after column formulas? Any chance to influence that? Andy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4