A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2009-07/msg00524.html below:

[Orgmode] Org-mode as a bug tracker.

[Top][All Lists] [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] From: Óscar Fuentes Subject: [Orgmode] Org-mode as a bug tracker. Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:34:13 +0200 User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) 
Right now I'm using Trac (a bug tracker and wiki combo) for bug tracking
and project documentation on my personal projects.

Looking at org-mode it seems a superb system for a this task, at least
for one-person projects:

 * Plain text.

 * No server required.

 * Can be stored on the same VCS than the source code.

 * Great for working off-line.

 * Features such as time tracking and others that Trac does not support
   or does badly with plugins.

 * It's Emacs!

The only downside is the lack of a referenced wiki system: simple links
to revisions (r1010) tickets (#245) etc.

Any reasons why this is not a good idea?

Any example of a similar org-mode usage?

-- 
Óscar

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4