A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2009-07/msg00326.html below:

Re: [Orgmode] Newbie Questions

[Top][All Lists] [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Newbie Questions Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:32:59 -0400
Eric S Fraga <address@hidden> wrote:

> At Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:08:31 -0700,
> Andrew M. Nuxoll wrote:
> > In my mind, there is no conflict between scheduling and deadlining.
> 
> I agree with you on this point but, in this case, it makes sense for
> both aspects to be highlighted in the agenda view.  I would suggest
> that you might wish to change (reduce) the warning period for the
> deadline when you schedule an item or alternatively not schedule an
> item but simply assign an appointment date/time (i.e. an active time
> stamp) to it for when you want to work on the task.  The latter is
> what I do in many cases.
> 

Quite likely it's a failure of imagination on my part, but I still
don't see why you would both schedule and deadline an item. Could
you provide a scenario where that would be useful?

Thanks,
Nick




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4