On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Jason Nielsen <jdn at math.carleton.ca> wrote: > Great work! The only implementation that I can think of that might be > useful (to me) is ecl but it isn't a major request as I primarily use > sbcl. Okay, I'll wait until there is demand for it. > Any hint of what the next steps for clpython are? Just curious ;-)! A few things that play: - Getting the shootout benchmark running <http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/>. The result of the tests that can be run is that CLPython performance is not bad, but CPython is on average a bit faster. - Running Sympy, a big pure-Python project, to show language completeness. Attempting this lead already to many small fixes and conversion of required Python standard library files. - A future goal is to have an Emacs IDE for Python based on Slime. In particular I'd like to have a great debugger for stepping through Python code. If anyone has good ideas or wishes for this, let me know. - Willem
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4