How can we measure how the usage or frequency of some feature, such as words, differs across some group or set, such as documents? One option is to use the log odds ratio, but the log odds ratio alone does not account for sampling variability; we haven't counted every feature the same number of times so how do we know which differences are meaningful? Enter the weighted log odds, which 'tidylo' provides an implementation for, using tidy data principles. In particular, here we use the method outlined in Monroe, Colaresi, and Quinn (2008) <doi:10.1093/pan/mpn018> to weight the log odds ratio by a prior. By default, the prior is estimated from the data itself, an empirical Bayes approach, but an uninformative prior is also available.
Version: 0.2.0 Imports: dplyr, rlang Suggests: covr, ggplot2, janeaustenr, knitr, rmarkdown, stringr, testthat (≥ 2.1.0), tidytext Published: 2022-03-22 DOI: 10.32614/CRAN.package.tidylo Author: Tyler Schnoebelen [aut], Julia Silge [aut, cre, cph], Alex Hayes [aut] Maintainer: Julia Silge <julia.silge at gmail.com> BugReports: https://github.com/juliasilge/tidylo/issues License: MIT + file LICENSE URL: https://juliasilge.github.io/tidylo/, https://github.com/juliasilge/tidylo NeedsCompilation: no Materials: README, NEWS CRAN checks: tidylo results Documentation: Downloads: Linking:Please use the canonical form https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidylo to link to this page.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4